信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (8): 55-63.doi: 10.12267/j.issn.2096-5931.2025.08.008

专题:人工智能+ 上一篇    下一篇

从平台经济到人工智能:治理机理比较与治理体系构建

From platform economy to artificial intelligence: comparison of governance mechanisms and construction of governance systems

刘志鹏1, 张津铭2   

  1. 1.中国信息通信研究院政策与经济研究所,北京 100191
    2.中国信息通信研究院人工智能研究所,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-30 出版日期:2025-08-25 发布日期:2025-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 张津铭,中国信息通信研究院人工智能研究所工程师,主要研究方向为人工智能安全治理
  • 作者简介:
    刘志鹏,中国信息通信研究院政策与经济研究所工程师,主要研究方向为人工智能治理、平台经济治理

LIU Zhipeng1, ZHANG Jinming2   

  1. 1. Policy and Economics Research Institute, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Artificial Intelligence Institute, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2025-06-30 Online:2025-08-25 Published:2025-09-02

摘要:

近年来,生成式人工智能推动新一轮技术革命进入爆发期,而平台经济作为上一轮以互联网为核心的技术革命中崛起的新型产业组织和资源枢纽,持续发挥重要作用。基于技术经济学、多中心治理及协同治理理论构建理论框架可见,人工智能治理在借鉴互联网治理经验的基础上,还需应对治理新挑战。基于新技术革命的发展阶段应适度放宽监管尺度,结合产业组织的变革方向应调整治理结构并优化责任分配,伴随价值创造方式的升级应将治理重心转向供给侧。对此,建议我国利用基础模型和微调模型关系优化监管链条,探索以产业基金为工具推动人工智能普惠发展,基于产业生态参与者的不同角色建立风险管理制度,进而形成产业链条、监管链条与多元治理链条协同耦合的人工智能治理体系。

关键词: 人工智能治理, 平台经济, 智能经济, 技术革命, 通用目的技术

Abstract:

In recent years, generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has promoted a new round of technological revolution into an explosive phase. The platform economy, as an emerging industrial organization and resource hub arising from the previous technological revolution centered on the internet, continues to play a significant role. Based on the analytical framework constructed from the perspectives of technical economics, polycentric governance, and collaborative governance theories, it is evident that AI governance, while drawing lessons from internet governance experiences, must also address new governance challenges. This entails appropriately relaxing regulatory stringency in line with the development stage of the new technological revolution, adjusting governance structures and optimizing responsibility distribution in accordance with the evolution of industrial organizations, and shifting the governance focus to the supply side as the methods of value creation upgrade. In this regard, China should leverage the relationship between foundation models and fine-tuned models to optimize the regulatory chain, explore the use of industrial funds as a tool to promote the inclusive development of AI, and establish a risk management system based on the different roles of participants in the industrial ecosystem. These measures will contribute to forming an AI governance system characterized by the synergistic coupling of industrial chain, regulatory chains, and multi-stakeholder governance chains.

Key words: artificial intelligence governance, platform economy, intelligent economy, technological revolution, general purpose technology

中图分类号: