信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (8): 11-17.doi: 10.12267/j.issn.2096-5931.2026.08.002

专题:数字安全与应用 上一篇    下一篇

智能应用中的算法偏见与社会安全风险研究

Research on algorithmic bias and social security risks in intelligent applications

耿峰1, 冯艺卓2   

  1. 1 青岛中集冷藏箱制造有限公司, 青岛 266300
    2 中国信息通信研究院泰尔终端实验室, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-02 出版日期:2026-08-25 发布日期:2026-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 冯艺卓
  • 作者简介:
    耿峰,青岛中集冷藏箱制造有限公司首席信息官,主要从事云计算、数字化精益制造、AI治理等方面的研究工作

GENG Feng1, FENG Yizhuo2   

  1. 1 Qingdao CIMC Reefer Container Manufacture Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266300, China
    2 CTTL Terminal Labs, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2026-07-02 Online:2026-08-25 Published:2026-09-02
  • Contact: FENG Yizhuo

摘要:

针对智能应用底层算法偏见引发的社会安全风险,通过文献综述与案例归纳,系统检索近年来国内外算法伦理、数字治理领域的重要文献,结合影响力较大的典型社会事件,首先分析算法偏见的风险传导链条;其次归纳出历史偏见、表征/代表性偏见、测量/标签偏见、聚合/算法设计偏见、评估/部署偏见5类基础算法偏见技术类型;再次从技术、商业、人为、制度4个维度分析算法偏见的成因,进而识别出可能引发的5类社会安全风险;最后提出构建“技术纠偏-制度约束-社会共治”的多元算法偏见治理体系。

关键词: 智能应用, 算法偏见, 算法伦理, 社会安全, 数字治理

Abstract:

To address the social security risks arising from biases in the underlying algorithms of intelligent applications, this study employs literature review and case analysis methods to systematically retrieve key publications in algorithm ethics and digital governance from recent years both domestically and internationally. By examining major social incidents with significant impact, it first analyzes the risk transmission chain of algorithmic bias. Second, it identifies five fundamental technical biases: historical bias, representation/representativeness bias, measurement/labeling bias, aggregation/algorithmic design bias, and evaluation/deployment bias. Third, it examines the causes of algorithmic bias across four dimensions—technical, commercial, human, and institutional—to further pinpoint five potential types of social security risks. Finally, it proposes the establishment of a multi-faceted governance system for algorithmic bias, comprising“technical correction—institutional constraints—social co-governance”.

Key words: intelligent application, algorithmic bias, algorithmic ethics, social security, digital governance

中图分类号: