信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 90-96.doi: 10.12267/j.issn.2096-5931.2026.04.012

专题:低空经济 上一篇    

低空政策法规体系的比较研究:国际经验与中国进路

Comparative study of low-altitude policy and regulatory systems: international experience and China’s approach

张贵珍, 黄蓓   

  1. 贵州大学法学院, 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-09 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-04-24
  • 作者简介:
    张贵珍 贵州大学法学院硕士研究生在读,主要研究方向为民商法、经济法
    黄蓓 贵州大学法学院副教授,主要研究方向为民商法、经济法

ZHANG Guizhen, HUANG Bei   

  1. School of Law, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
  • Received:2026-03-09 Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-04-24

摘要:

近年来,低空经济的快速发展推动低空空域利用方式持续拓展,传统以安全管控为核心的治理模式面临调整压力。低空经济治理既需法律规范体系支撑,也有赖于政策工具引导,二者的配置关系逐步成为影响治理效果的关键制度议题。从制度工具视角切入,在厘清低空政策与法规功能差异基础上构建比较框架,进而对不同国家低空治理实践开展类型化归纳。研究发现,国际上主要存在政策推动型、法规主导型以及政策与法规协同推进3种低空治理模式。不同模式在制度目标取向、治理工具配置与实施效果方面存在显著差异,且表现出从单一工具向组合治理转变、安全管控与产业发展逐步并重的演进特征。结合我国政策制度环境,低空经济治理应在保持政策灵活性的同时完善法律规范体系,通过风险分级与制度协同构建分层次的治理结构。

关键词: 低空经济, 低空治理, 政策工具, 法律规范, 制度比较

Abstract:

The rapid development of the low-altitude economy has expanded the utilization of low-altitude airspace and placed new demands on traditional governance models centered on safety control. Governance of the low-altitude economy relies on both legal regulations and policy instruments, and their configuration has become an important institutional issue affecting governance outcomes. From the perspective of institutional tools, this paper constructs a comparative framework based on the functional differences between policies and regulations and examines governance practices in different countries. The study identifies three main models: policy-driven, regulation-led, and coordinated policy-regulation approaches. These models differ in institutional objectives, governance tools, and implementation outcomes, and show a gradual shift from single instruments to combined governance, with increasing emphasis on both safety control and industrial development. In light of China’s institutional context, governance of the low-altitude economy should maintain policy flexibility while improving the legal framework and establishing a tiered governance structure through risk classification and institutional coordination.

Key words: low-altitude economy, low-altitude governance, policy instruments, legal norms, institutional comparison

中图分类号: