信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策

信息通信技术与政策 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 1-5.

   下一篇

标准专利案可比许可协议的选取方法分析

Analysis of selectionmethodof comparable licensing agreement in standard patent cases

  

  • 出版日期:2019-10-15 发布日期:2020-11-20
  • 作者简介:
    毕春丽:中国信息通信研究院技术与标准研究所知识产权中心副主任,高级工程师

  • Online:2019-10-15 Published:2020-11-20

摘要: FRAND(公平、合理和无歧视)原则中最核心的问题就是要提供公平、合理、无歧视性的许可费用,在涉及此类案件时,常用的有可比许可协议法、自顶向下(TopDown)法、自下向上法(Bottom-Up)等,在比较复杂的案件中,还需要几种方法结合进行分析。由于可比许可协议的达成是在双方自愿的情况下签署,符合市场化原则,具有许可环境的相似性,且容易操作,往往成为法官优先选择的方法。本文在分析华为与UP、爱立信与TCL等案件的基础上,对可比许可协议方法的内涵、确定可比许可协议的考量因素等进行分析,为企业签署相应的许可协议或在许可费纠纷中如何筛选合适的许可协议提供一些借鉴。

关键词: 标准专利, 许可费, 可比许可协议

Abstract: The core issue ofFRANDprinciple is to provide fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing fees. In this type of cases, the commonly used methods are comparable licensing agreement, Top-down and Bottom-up, etc. In some complex cases, several methods need to be combined to analyze. Because the conclusion of comparable licensing agreement is signed voluntarily by both parties, conforms to the principle of marketization, has the similarity of licensing environment, and is easy to operate, it often becomes the preferred method for judges. Based on the analysis of cases of Huawei and UP, Ericsson and TCL, this paper analyses the connotation of comparable licensing agreement method. It also provides some reference for enterprises to sign corresponding licensing agreements or how to screen suitable licensing agreements in licensing fee disputes.

Key words: SEPs, royalty rate, comparable licensing agreement