[1] |
中国知识产权研究会. 中国知识产权研究会发布《2021年中国企业在美知识产权纠纷调查报告》[EB/OL]. (2022-7-11)[2022-11-13]. http://www.cnips.org.cn/a17615.html.
|
[2] |
易继明. 遏制专利蟑螂:评美国专利新政及其对中国的启示[J]. 法律科学:西北政法大学学报, 2014(2):10.
|
[3] |
秦乐, 李梅, 毕春丽. 全球NPE知识产权风险及我国应对策略[J]. 信息通信技术与政策, 2022(2):93-96.
|
[4] |
吕磊. 美国对专利海盗的规范措施及我国的借鉴[J]. 法学杂志, 2014, 35(5):9.
|
[5] |
胡小伟. NPE诉讼的价值审视与规制选择[J]. 知识产权, 2021(1):77-85.
|
[6] |
孟金喆. 论专利法中的“公开”与“保护”[J]. 商品与质量·焦点关注, 2012(3).
|
[7] |
RPX. Q4 in Review: NPE Litigation Holds Steady in 2022 Despite Top Venue Headwinds[EB/OL]. (2023-1-10)[2023-1-15]. https://www.rpxcorp.com/intelligence/blog/q4-in-review-npe-litigation-holds-steady-in-2022-despite-top-venue-headwinds/.
|
[8] |
Lex Machina. Lex Machina Releases 2022 Patent Litigation Report[EB/OL]. (2022-5-19)[2022-12-15]. https://lexmachina.com/media/press/lex-machina-releases-2022-patent-litigation-report/.
|
[9] |
Unified Patents. 2021 Patent Dispute Report: Year in Review[EB/OL]. (2022-1-13)[2022-10-10]. https://www.unifiedpatents.com/insights/2022/1/3/2021-patent-dispute-report-year-in-review.
|
[10] |
RPX. Q4 in Review: NPE Litigation Holds Steady in 2022 Despite Top Venue Headwinds[EB/OL]. (2023-1-10)[2023-1-15]. https://www.rpxcorp.com/intelligence/blog/q4-in-review-npe-litigation-holds-steady-in-2022-despite-top-venue-headwinds/.
|
[11] |
RPX. Q3 in Review: NPEs Cling to West Texas as Vidal Continues to Shape PTAB Policy[EB/OL]. (2022-10-11)[2023-1-15]. https://www.rpxcorp.com/intelligence/blog/q4-in-review-npe-litigation-holds-steady-in-2022-despite-top-venue-headwinds/.
|
[12] |
RPX. Q4 in Review: NPEs Cap off a Busy 2021 as SEP Policies Evolve in the US and UK[EB/OL]. (2022-1-11)[2022-9-10]. https://www.rpxcorp.com/intelligence/blog/q4-in-review-npes-cap-off-a-busy-2021-as-sep-policies-evolve-in-the-us-and-uk/.
|
[13] |
德克萨斯州东区法院. 2:14-cv-912-JRG[Z], 2016.
|
[14] |
秦乐. 美国惩罚性赔偿最新判例对我国的启示[J]. 电信网技术, 2017(1):15-19.
|
[15] |
美国联邦巡回上诉法院. 134 S. Ct. 2358-60[Z], 2014.
|
[16] |
美国联邦巡回上诉法院. 881F.3d1360[Z], 2018.
|
[17] |
陈甜. 软件的可专利性研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2016.
|
[18] |
徐薇. 美国专利保护客体的最新司法实践:以Berkheimer v. HP Inc.案为视角[J]. 专利代理, 2021(1):62-66.
|
[19] |
美国联邦最高法院. 137 S. Ct. 1514[Z], 2017.
|
[20] |
美国专利商标局. No. IPR2020-00019[Z], 2020.
|
[21] |
DOJ. Draft Policy Statement on Licensing Negotiations and Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/Rand Commitments[EB/OL]. (2021-12-6)[2023-1-3]. https://www.justice.gov/atr/page/file/1453471/download.
|
[22] |
李永红. 论美国专利保护客体判断的两步法[J]. 知识产权, 2020, No.231(5):89-96.
|
[23] |
全球技术地图. 《美国人工智能政策评估》9大AI政策领域及其未来发展方向[EB/OL]. (2022-9-3)[2023-1-10]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1742876757722548491&wfr=spider&for=pc.
|
[24] |
宣頔. 美国金融商业方法专利保护之动态平衡变迁与启示[J]. 知识产权, 2019(8):8.
|
[25] |
朱韶斌. 中国企业如何应对美国专利诉讼地[J]. 法人, 2017(10):70-72.
|
[26] |
张子彬. 上市公司主动退市法定程序研究. 上海社会科学院, 2017.
|
[27] |
黄莺. 特斯拉联合本田及10余家企业,支持苹果、谷歌等四家巨头起诉美国专利商标局[EB/OL]. (2022-2-17)[2022-2-19]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/1itoVa-69st9APG7OUlJ3g.
|