WU Hanbing, FENG Yizhuo. Research on user authorization mechanisms and identity forgery risks in agent interconnection scenarios[J]. Information and Communications Technology and Policy, 2026, 52(8): 2-10.
Otsuka T, Toyoda K, Zhang Y, et al. AI identity: standards, gaps, and research directions for AI agents[PP/OL].V1. arXiv (2026-04-25) [2026-06-28]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.23280.
Chowdhary S. AI identity for agentic systems: integrating PAM and IAM for secure autonomy[J]. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 2026, 12(1):1170-1179. https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4985.
[11]
Goswami A. Secure intent protocol: JWT compatible agentic identity and workflow management[EB/OL]. (2025-12-31) [2026-06-28]. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-goswami-agentic-jwt-00.
[12]
Gaire S, Gyawali S, Mishra S, et al. Systematization of knowledge: security and safety in the model context protocol ecosystem[PP/OL].V1. arXiv (2025-12-09) [2026-06-28]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.08290.
[13]
Radosevich B, Halloran J T. MCP safety audit: LLMs with the model context protocol allow major security exploits[PP/OL].V1. arXiv (2025-04-02) [2026-06-28]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.03767.
[14]
Prasad A, Krishnan R, Lopez D, et al. Cryptographically verifiable actor chains for OAuth 2.0 token exchange[EB/OL]. (2026-03-27) [2026-06-28]. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mw-spice-actor-chain-04.html.
[15]
RFC 8693: OAuth 2.0 token exchange[S].
[16]
RFC 6749: The OAuth 2.0 authorization framework[S].